Mexico is a good place to live if you enjoy the sport of soccer as much as I do. For soccer fans in North America, Wednesday night is big indeed. Its the latest round of 2010 world cup qualifying. It is also the reinstatement of the intense rivalry that has developed over the past 10 years or so between the US and Mexico. This time around is a little different as the Americans are the clear favorites going into the match. A well deserved distinction after dominating the series as of late in particular on US soil.
Did I mention the game is in Columbus, OH. The conventional wisdom is that the uncomfortable conditions should favor the Americans. In addition to the weather, Mexico’s Gerrardo Torrado, Fernando Arce and Carlos Vela are serving card suspensions and cannot play against the U.S., while another top talent, Andres Guardado, is injured. As a Canadian gringo in Mexico, I will cheering for the Mexicans on Wednesday night. I have no illusions however, it is very likely the US walks away with all 3 points up for grabs. However, I do think Mexico can defiantly get a draw, and maybe a win. For that to happen, a few things will have to change from their previous attempts.
First the players and the soccer culture at large will need to have a different outlook on this game. A draw is OK! That seems to be devil talk around here, but the reality is a draw away to the US would be a great result given current circumstances. This mindset is significant, because it potentially changes the overall approach to this game. Secondly Mexico will need to take a look at a couple of facts regarding this rivalry and the US team in general. The US typically beats Mexico in the following fashion. the U.S. relinquishes possession to Mexico who attacks on the wings looking to penetrate with quick passes into the box. Mexico is able to penetrate 1 or 2 times in the first half, but is rebuffed by great goal-keeping. At the end of the first half, or midway through the second half (when the Mexican players are tired from their attempts to push forward), the US is able to steal the ball and then pushes it out on the wing at midfield. The ball is quickly pushed forward to Landon Donovan or Demarcus Beasley who usually only have one or two Mexican defenders to beat as they are usually caught out of position. The goal is typically created on plays such as these, or off set pieces given due to fouls by again out of position Mexican defenders. It’s an especially frustrating way to lose a game due to the fact that Mexico is typically the one dictating the pace. The other fact is that when US loses, for example during the 2006 world cup, they lose in a similar fashion to how the US beats Mexico. For example, the Czech Republic clogged the middle, and used quick counters to control the game, and dominated the US 3-0. Another example from that tournament is Ghana, they caught the US on a counter with a speedy winger, and never looked backed. Given those two facts here is how I think Mexico can get a result.

Defense first, counter second, and forget about a traditional attack. When the US has the ball, everyone on the Mexican side must be absolutely committed to defending, this goes for the players up top as well. Sven will put the players in a position to defend well by clogging up the middle, and forcing the US to the flanks. Using 3 defensive midfielders will be the key to not giving spaces to the US in which they thrive on with their speed. Clogging the middle makes the most sense since attacking too much and committing too many players forward, is really the Mexican weakness against the US. Pardo in the as a central midfielder will be the key to delivering passes to El Tri’s speedy attack of Nery, Bravo, and Gio. I think the starting lineup and formation should look something like this.
osorio–rafa–galindo–salcido
perez—–Pardo—-leandro
———nery—gio———–
————bravo
Sven Eriksson has brought the team into Columbus to try and acclimate them to the cold. One thing to keep in mind regarding the weather is if it gets too wet, snowy, windy etc, any technical or skill advantage that the Americans have may become neutralized.
Its one thing two have a plan, its entirely another to execute it. Make no mistake Sven Eriksson is more than a capable manager who has put together a plan perhaps similar to what I have suggested on how to get a result against the US. The problem may be will the players trust him enough to execute the plan. That will be key. I can tell you that living here and having my ear on the ground the soccer culture in general seems more obsessed with which roster spots are occupied by players that are naturalized citizens, rather than focused on a specific strategy. I also find it interesting that many supporters firmly believe that Mexico has a “responsibility” to score and win the game. Of course, I think Mexico’s main responsibility is to qualify for the 2010 world cup in South Africa, and once there, obtain the best result possible. The first step to accomplishing that goal will be to travel to Columbus with a sound strategy, have the players stay disciplined and execute the game plan, the rest will fall into place.
by agringoinmexico.com